Editorial & AI Disclosure

Editorial & AI Disclosure

n

Last updated: [Insert date]

nn

Editorial purpose

n

The AI Impact Wire tracks AI for good across policy, research, funding, jobs, events, use cases, tools, and public-interest technology. Our goal is to help readers find useful signals, understand why they matter, and follow original sources for full context.

nn

How we source content

n

We monitor public-interest sources including research institutes, public agencies, multilateral organizations, foundations, nonprofit organizations, responsible AI groups, public funding databases, event pages, RSS feeds, and other relevant sources.

nn

Summaries and attribution

n

We summarize and classify items in our own words and link back to original sources. We do not republish full articles. Source names, original links, and publication dates should be included where available.

nn

AI-assisted workflow

n

Some summaries, classifications, tags, excerpts, and “why it matters” notes may be drafted or assisted by AI tools. AI-assisted content should be reviewed before publication. AI outputs may contain errors, omissions, outdated information, or incomplete context.

nn

Human review

n

Editors should review AI-assisted drafts for accuracy, tone, relevance, source attribution, deadlines, and factual claims before publishing. Readers should consult the original source before relying on any item.

nn

What we cover

n

n
• AI for climate, health, education, humanitarian response, accessibility, public services, and equity.

n

• Responsible AI, AI governance, safety, accountability, transparency, and evaluation.

n

• Funding, RFPs, jobs, fellowships, challenges, and events related to AI for good.

n

• Practical tools, frameworks, datasets, and implementation resources.

n

nn

Corrections

n

If you see an error, outdated link, missing source, or attribution concern, contact us at: [insert contact email].